Why read action? Maybe finding ideas inside action: megastructures, cybernetics, economic systems. Ultimately it's all boring when the book doesn't consider emotions.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People, not numbers, may validate this. The reproducibility crisis I'd not a small thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The rise of videogames.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absolutely true for me, a male.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As a guy who reads a lot of fiction, I almost never read anything published after '65. Sure there are the cormac McCarthys, Elmore leonards & john sandfords out there but those books are very finite. Cant think of any sci-fi writer save for Andy weir who's great. Just not there.
-
Really? Nothing published after 1965 meets with your approval? Nothing? Serious question: did you lose a bet with a being of faerie? Are you secretly 300 years old?pic.twitter.com/mGHQcbyoIl
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
https://mythsofthemirror.com/2016/07/11/reader-surveys-by-genre-and-gender/ … Here you go. The original source, a study by Statista, is hidden behind a paywall, but this blogger smuggled out the graph. I wish the genres were more granular, but it's the best source I've found so far.
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
do the numbers validate this hypothesis?