I'm interested in feedback on this thesis, both on historical and on investment grounds. If this thesis is true, what else does it enable or predict?
my point with the entanglement thesis is that there isn't a there there with what you're trying to tag. It's bothsides or nothing. My best take on a bothsides version is hedgehogs are eating the world. It's a beef-only mindset that can only think in conflict mode
-
-
which means it comes in pairs... (right/left, authoritarian/libertarian, globalist/nationalist etc) if you want to label only one side as a "thing" in isolation, you can only produce polemics, not insight (which is fine if that's what you want to do)
-
Also, unclear why you're conflating markets and meritocracy as one thing. Markets are a big, real embodied thing that exist and have a history and evolutionary tendencies that can be analyzed. Meritocracy is a societal ideal that only "exists" in limited embodiments like SAT
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
If you don't know what this is about, be glad.