Writers read their contemporaries working on similar things much less that readers interested in the same subject and with similar levels of reading volume. It’s a sort of driving blind spot effect where you can’t quite see the car one carlength behind you to your left
-
-
It is interesting that blogosphere did *not* naturally evolve a peer-review type mechanism, which tells you how artificial that is. It instead evolved a competitive sympathetic citation race (ie virality) as the marker of memetic potency, a cousin of truth just like peer review.
Show this thread -
Cf my old threadstack on independent research, I’m now coming at it from a methodological angle, thinking in terms of what it would take to form effective collaborations among wannabe-indies, perhaps using the affordances of tools like
@RoamResearch. https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1195937380210921472?s=21 …https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1195937380210921472 …Show this thread -
It is easy to underestimate the importance of the toolchains and media. But a lot about academic research can be explained by the fact that it’s conducted in PDF units, woven together by citation indices and one of the shadiest publishing industries on the planet cc
@vaughn_tanShow this thread -
But you can’t “fix” the academic publishing Death Star industry (there’s dozens of exposes and histories out there) and that’s an uninteresting project anyway since it’s just taking sides in the hostage-academics vs captors Stockholm syndrome game. I don’t care about either.
Show this thread -
I’m interested in extending what’s working well about blogging and it’s descendants (microblogging, threadoblogging, webboblogging....)
Show this thread -
The lesson of 30 years of tech development of web native media is that you cannot start from abstract values about knowledge (“epistemically virtue ethics”?) or imitation of failing incumbent systems (Gall’s law). You have to build on what actually works.
Show this thread -
This is medium-message co-evolution. The question is not “how can we do academic style or old republic-if-letters/invisible college type research using web technologies?” The question is: “what kind of research works particularly well on hypertex media?”
Show this thread -
Building on what works inevitably means challenging epistemic-ethics dogmas. Doctrines like logical positivism and falsificationidm didn’t arise from nowhere or from noble platonic considerations. They are consequences of print technology and university style scholarship.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.