I feel like I should do a thread on this, but first I need a better name for our mode of production than "internet republic of letters". Genteel letter-writing within a mild bubble of mutual flattery and recognition and stylized/mannered rivalries really isn't what's going onhttps://twitter.com/vgr/status/1204504961750458368 …
-
-
So it is a fool's errand to go around looking to create (or identify and name in the wild) emerging "internet institutions". The mode of production is essentially extra-institutional, and its mode of impact is to reshape the landscape of institutional power.
Show this thread -
So if you "steal" a conversation about office politics and re-situate it in a conversation and television show criticism, you change both. The measure of your success is the degree to which you force both sides to respond to the newly activated entanglement.
Show this thread -
In a way, certain disciplines within academia try to do this, by trafficking internally in what they call "provocations" and "crises" and "critical conversations" but their mode ensures all subversive potential is drained before you even start.
Show this thread -
Just leaving the thread dangling here as a starter stub. There's something here I'm driving at that I can't clearly see myself.
Show this thread -
Okay another point. Besides subversion, there is an element of deep solipsism to how we produce. This is why the focus on "debate" and "conversation" feels like missing the point. I'm happy to debate where that helps, but generally, I'm off on an exit bunytrail, not voice
Show this thread -
The QA function of conversation/peer review, which is highly ceremonialized in academia is turned into a conscious risk management choice in internet mode. Do you want to go out on a limb on your own, or derisk early. Former is not a choice in academia.
Show this thread -
Because of deep ties to the way university research is funded, academic mode production has a ceremonialized fail-fast aspect to it. Going off on your own spirit quest on a topic for 5 years is career suicide. Publish and get past ornery peer reviewers frequently or perish.
Show this thread -
This may be why the dream of institutionalizing independent research is wishful thinking. If you want others to pay, you're going to be subject yourself to early, conservative QA. No funding source will pay for a world of extended solipsistic questing.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1195789557465153536 …
Show this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
