at some point in the Rust Age you referenced a trilemma that was something like "if we consider 'fundamental physics' to refer to the world, our theories likely don't capture it, whereas if we refer to our current theories, they're likely not fundamental"
Conversation
do you remember what this is called/where it is? did i make up this memory?
1
1
Replying to
Doesn’t ring a bell. What was the actual trilemma? Was there a pick 2 of 3 triangle involved?
1
Replying to
that is the aggravating part, i can't remember part 3 but it seemed awfully insightful at the time. oh well, i will continue google spelunking
2
Replying to
You might also be thinking of this though it’s not rust age
1
1
Replying to
i do love the penrose diagram, but it's not that one- specifically about the impossibility of appeal to "physics" as a "fundamental" theory
1
Replying to
Might not be me, and doesn’t sound like Sarah either. Try Brian skinner physics posts.

