@vgr at some point in the Rust Age you referenced a trilemma that was something like "if we consider 'fundamental physics' to refer to the world, our theories likely don't capture it, whereas if we refer to our current theories, they're likely not fundamental"
-
Show this thread
-
@vgr do you remember what this is called/where it is? did i make up this memory?1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
Doesn’t ring a bell. What was the actual trilemma? Was there a pick 2 of 3 triangle involved?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
that is the aggravating part, i can't remember part 3 but it seemed awfully insightful at the time. oh well, i will continue google spelunking
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
You might also be thinking of this though it’s not rust agehttps://www.ribbonfarm.com/2015/01/16/on-the-design-of-escaped-realities/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
i do love the penrose diagram, but it's not that one- specifically about the impossibility of appeal to "physics" as a "fundamental" theory
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Might not be me, and doesn’t sound like Sarah either. Try Brian skinner physics posts.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.