One of the annoying things about my current research on temporality is that there are several big fat books everybody (correctly) regards as essential references that I don’t have the patience to read fully.
Conversation
I’ve snacked, sampled, browsed, and read around them enough to be confident in my assessment that I get what they’re about. I can to situate my ideas in their context, and have extracted what I need. But there’s still this niggling good-student sense of phoning in my homework.
3
2
11
During my PhD my advisor or somebody offered a wise heuristic: for every 100 references you collect (and 100 is the minimum to claim mastery of a subject) and grok the basic point of, you actually shallow read maybe 10, and deep read maybe 3-5.
2
6
26
The strategic trick is realizing that the 3-5 you go deep on are almost certainly NOT going to be the consensus seminal references in the field. That’s a recipe for boring incrementalism. You get interesting results by putting weird, unexpected obscure picks in your top 5.
1
6
30
Still, this is hard when a subject is dominated by gravity field of big fat books. It’s like operating in Jupiter orbit. Engineering research is like the asteroid belt. Mostly papers. If it’s a big fat book, it’s already a textbook in civilized core, not part of the frontier.
1
2
7
Research on temporality is shaped by the gravity field of a few big fat books:
J. T. Fraser’s Time: the Familiar Stranger
Proust’s In Search of Lost Time
The Einstein-Bergson debate (an event with a fat literature attached)
David Landes’ Revolution in Time
3
2
17
Replying to
Do you care more about temporality as experienced, or a more objective / scientific notion of temporality, or both/ their relationship?
1
Replying to
that distinction is a couple of abstraction levels above what I want. If the ref works within traditional objective/subjective distinctions it's not deep enough for my needs
Replying to
Any chance you could share what the kind of take you're working on then? I'm really curious about what you have in mind!
1
Replying to
It's a book length project. If I could summarize it in a tweet, I wouldn't need to try writing it.
1
Show replies

