Where “lawyer” can be loosely construed as any profession dedicated to upholding systems of rules, whether theological, monarchical, constitutional, or ideological in origin. There may be lip service to the phenomenology the rules are “about” but internal consistency is central
-
-
Show this thread
-
“Doing science” is developing and exercising judgment about rules. Do the rules extend beyond the justifiable? Do they not formalize enough of what is justifiable? Does it apply here? Should it be broken there? Corner cases make bad law, but they make for good science.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I haven't read it, but this sounds reminiscent of Paul Feyerabend's "Against Method" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_Method …
-
Yep one of my favorites
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.