Conversation

Both falsificationism and verificationism, adopted as actual operating standards, are recipes for analysis paralysis. The only thing that keeps you moving forward is a actively looking for ways to move forward which do not appear in any predictable ways.
Replying to
True critical thought must incorporate the possibility of the limitedness of thought itself. Like chess, it is mostly a game against one’s own errors — which is why it can never be approached by procedure or reduced to mere technique. “Humility is the handmaiden of liminality”
1
Replying to
I've got a who noted similarly that most real scientific hypothesis are neither falsifiable or verifiable. His take was to build an infinite complexity hierarchy of verification and map it onto topological ideas *static and wails*