basic go to market thinking isnt something most people who engineer things for a living are incentived to think about
Conversation
Replying to
Not really. I worked on drone and autonomous robotics for years and literally nobody I met on the civilian industry, military, or academic side had any illusions an;it what they were building and how it would be used. We literally used specific military and policing use cases.
2
The peaceful civilian use cases are always just a nice-to-have plus market on the thinking. There is no agonizing or moral dilemmas. People with those social determinist tendencies tend not to get into such work at all.
1
The trope of the clueless engineer who suddenly has a humanist consciousness raising moment of “oh god what have I done” is pure humanist wishful thinking combined with the self-important belief that they’re more morally “evolved” and see things poor dumb tech-fetishists don’t.
2
1
Replying to
They are dominantly design/UX side people or people who came to the tech side from humanities/social science because they discovered an aptitude for programming. I’d say engineers who fit your caricature are <10%. Most of us are total death-star assholes who accept the Empire 😎
1
1
Replying to
thank you for proving my point
Quote Tweet
im entirely convinced that the majority of engineering education institutions in this country are morally bankrupt and ethically compromised
Show this thread
2
1

