Note #3 Learning projects to prepare to go deep on a subject are not research even if it feels like it Reading published literature and blogging a few derivative observations is not research Critiquing/finding flaws in published papers is indie peer-review, not research
-
Show this thread
-
I find that autodidacts who haven’t experienced institutional R&D environments have a self-congratulatory low threshold for what they count as research. It’s a bit like vanity publishing or fan fiction. This mismatch doesn’t exist as much in indie art, consulting, game dev etc
1 reply 6 retweets 82 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Kevin Marks
I’m on a year-long fellowship right now, and this is partly what has made me admit the conceit in the “indie researcher” self-label. I’m doing this sort of thinking for the first time since ~2006 or so (the year I last submitted a paper to a peer-reviewed journal).https://twitter.com/kevinmarks/status/1195806039708520448 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
1 reply 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
It’s also reminding me how much I enjoy doing the real thing. It’s like a year long vacation back to my own past.
2 replies 0 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
Ironically, most modern tenured faculty don’t get to do much R&D either, at least in STEM. They’re too busy fund-raising. They’re more like angel investors and board advisors to grad students and postdocs. Humanities and social sciences may perhaps be better, I don’t know.
6 replies 3 retweets 55 likesShow this thread -
If you’re thinking kickstarter-like funding mechanisms, forget it. You’ll be asking for 10x as much money as typical artistic or startuppy projects, have no natural rewards to hand out, and a far lower likelihood of success.
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
A good public example: Breaking Smart S2 was a medium-depth research project I thought I could sustain on my own (a16z supported S1). I gave up looking for funding after a couple of half-hearted pitches to orgs I thought might be a fit for the topic.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
The topic I wanted to research, and got about 1/3 the way through, was institution building in the Great Weirding. It’s the sort of thing that’s not a natural fit for any corporate funding source.
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
Current plan is to package and flush out what I have so far as a sort of “Christmas Special” about 1/5 the scope/ambition of S1.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but did you ever consider crowdfunding this and/or charging for the content? I’d pay.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
See downthread. You wouldn’t pay enough 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.