This thread feels like it could do with a write-up, but I feel lazy about doing it.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1193614633090707456 …
-
-
Replying to @vgr
I think it works because it tells the other side that you have a reasonably complete predictive model of what people-like-them think and say. Being fully aware of anything they could say means that you don't need to listen to what they're saying now.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @rob_knight @vgr
"You have no capacity to surprise me" is a hurtful thing to say to a person, but it's not recognised as a common insult. I wonder if it's becoming more common now, in a more diverse online world? It's a compression technique, really.
4 replies 4 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @rob_knight @vgr
We experience *both* a greater diversity of viewpoints, *and* a greater number of people espousing those viewpoints. At some point you just *have* to say "ah, these people are all boomers and say boomerish things, I shall henceforth regard them as NPCs of class 'boomer'".
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @rob_knight @vgr
The alternative means engaging with far more than Dunbar's number of notionally individual people, which is inefficient if they mostly say the same things. And so many people are saying so much nowadays that compression is essential cognitive self-preservation.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @rob_knight @vgr
The only thing that bothers me about this neat explanation is that it doesn't seem to be what I do. Or, at least, I feel uncomfortable about doing it, and always try to give people the chance to say the surprising thing that breaks the predictive model. I'm sad when they don't.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
You're not typical. You have and are exercising far more agency than most of the cohort you'd be identified with.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.