It’s more that mere inequality or a redistribution problem. The system is trying to solve for returns higher than can be realized by investing in the median human. Otherwise UBI would be a no-brainer answer rather than a debate.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
This accords with a lot of things I’ve heard — basically, stimulus policy tries to goose the economy by increasing the number of dollars in people’s pockets and hoping they’ll spend them. But investors know there’s nothing good to spend on, so they sit on tons of money.
-
Result: we’re not richer, but we are more unequal. The financial elite gain not in consumption but in relative security. The extra “money” never corresponded to extra goods; it is fake; it is a measure of “low risk of eviction” more than a measure of “having nice things”
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
-
This is a clear signal from matkets to become a stable capitalist investment. Or else.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.