NO
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“The desire of the Sons of Anarchy is, indeed, to dispense with leaders ; for since all men in the formula are equal, it is un- reasonable that one should lead rather than another.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's more reciprocal than positional.
-
Frankly, anyone who put a, No, there isn't doing enough self-reflection.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Everyone saying "no" is lying in some sense or another
-
Copy: I think a singular leader isn’t necessary for identity builders. With the exclusion of feral humans, we’re all story-line/character based animals. My leader is a coalescence of identities.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
...and that's why I don't vajrayana ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sample bias alert :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The concept of a leader is yet another human addiction; and a very bad one in my humble opinion. It’s lazy to want to have leaders. We could instead build social systems that [...]helps us to break out of the limited domination systemhttps://link.medium.com/teSraiCJf1
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, but my preferences are good leader > no leader > bad leader
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.