Thinking about the rule of totalitarianism "Everything not forbidden is compulsory." (T. H. White) which Gell-Mann ported to physics. Science of Discworld 2 states it as the principle of societies run on tribal law.
-
-
Or equivalently, freedom to act or not act in non-totalitarian systems is a function of an explicit procedural accommodation of formal ignorance. “It’s neither forbidden, nor compulsory” = “we don’t know”
Show this thread -
You can only be free in proportion to the ignorance you acknowledge Everything you claim as knowledge will force you to act or run into a constraint
Show this thread -
In practice both prohibitions and compulsions constrain behavior down to a resolution threshold of indifference. That threshold is where gap between world perception and claimed complete knowledge of the world is small enough that you can credibly claim omniscience/omnipotence
Show this thread -
Closing this gap = exercise of raw power and hiding anything whose appearance cannot be made to conform to omniscience/omnipotence posture. Interestingly this always requires totalitarian human rulers. Totalitarian rule systems alone can’t maintain the appearance of totality.
Show this thread -
A related humanist principle is “to understand everything is to forgive everything” This allows for pseudo free will. You can make choices, there will be wrong choices in proportion to knowledge, and you can’t be held responsible by those who know better.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.