I forget who made this argument, but it was in a large-group OODA loop discussion in New York: the higher the VUCA in a large-scale conflict environment, the more virtue ethics is strategically adaptive because it can accumulate a following via imitability.
It computes an answer, the "right" part is necessarily solipsistic though, the other two run into intractability because they attempt non-solipsistic computations
-
-
It computes an answer. I don't see say, a computation limited version of the categorical imperative as being solipsistic, even if it doesn't perfectly capture the preferences of others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.