I forget who made this argument, but it was in a large-group OODA loop discussion in New York: the higher the VUCA in a large-scale conflict environment, the more virtue ethics is strategically adaptive because it can accumulate a following via imitability.
the boundaries among the 3 seem blurry, but I liken them to: deontological = agile, consequentialist = waterfall, virtue ethics = wireframes with no indication of how to actually build something under them
-
-
What you're suggesting is a bit more meta than that... it's something like agile development of a waterfall plan or something.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I basically agree with that, except I will note that “agile” here must refer to late-2000s capital-A “agile” as taught by the legions of freelance Agile consultants, and probably not the original ethos of agile as the founders of the movement envisioned it...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.