I mean, don’t expect to deeply understand everything everyone is idly throwing out here. When you get the spirit of an idea and a sense of where someone is hoping with a thought and you want to see where it goes, help it along. If you don’t, shrug and move on.
-
-
Show this thread
-
It’s not a court of law, a Mueller investigation, or an NSF proposal review panel. It’s a bunch of people sorta pooling their largely unedited inner dialogues into a hivemind/graphmind.
Show this thread -
Yeah there’s also tiresome shills, personal brand builders, malicious opinion hackers, kangaroo courts of public opinion, and a president who really shouldn’t be trying to run foreign policy or the economy here. Still the default “spitballing” assumption isn’t a bad one.
Show this thread -
I mean jeez we can’t even edit tweets here “Hoping” a few tweets above is “going”
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is this suggestion discussible?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, yeah; it's much harder to score status points off of people if we're playing in open mode instead of closed mode. In closed mode, I can pretty reliably be right when everyone else is wrong. In open mode, gah, I have to actually bring or induce insights!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.