It's funny how people think a post-apocalyptic landscape will be relatively flat socioeconomically. At most they think there will be small-scale warlords or Dunbar-scale anarchist communes. No. There will be deathstar billionaires with private armies and narrow-deep tech stacks.
-
-
"Nation-state industrial base" has basically been miniaturized to billionaire scale. In terms of civilizational capability, it's the equivalent of mainframes evolving into smartphones (smartphone equivalent of civilization being postapocalyptic billionaire redoubt)
Show this thread -
I mean, I'm larping extended-universe builder in bits form, but with a few billion you can actually do it in atoms space. There are no necessary capabilities of nation states that cannot now be maintained by a small-scale billionaire.
Show this thread -
If there is to be a broad-based, inclusive, participatory form of civilization to succeed the nation state, it cannot be based on atoms-tech. It has to be based on software-tech that billionaires can neither replicate, nor compete with.
Show this thread -
Putin vs. oligarchs, and China vs. its oligarchs are probably the last chapter of the ancient conflict between wealth clans and impersonal nation states that the latter have a decisive advantage in. If the nation states weaken by say another order of magnitude, the oligarchs win.
Show this thread -
I'm an ideologue here. I like some billionaires, dislike others. If there's no broad-based civilizational condition, I'd be willing to pick among billionaires rather than being out in the wilderness in some sort of ratty indie survivalist camp full of starving people in henleys.
Show this thread -
In many ways, this is already happening of course. I've called it a 4th world condition. And the gated communities are underwritten by billionaire developers, not by states. A lot of us live in one billionaire bubble, earning and spending in other billionaire bubbles :D
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I did *not* expect to hear this take from you. Details???
-
Why not?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Have you read 1632 by Eric Flint? It's an interesting (fictional) model of how this could work for a couple orders of magnitude cheaper on mid-19th century tech.
-
No, sounds interesting!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.