Investing seems like a domain where charisma is particularly misleading. If you ranked billionaires in 2 ways, by how much their net worth has increased since the start of their careers (factoring in inherited wealth), versus how much they get talked about, what would you see?
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @spenceraviav
If by top right you mean super high net worth, high media, then no. He is 2.3B but gets media comparable to say Bezos or Gates, who are an order of magnitude higher. So he'd be in the low end of the wealth axis, high end of the media axis. He's highly charismatically leveraged.
10:54 AM - 5 Oct 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.