I don't necessarily like any of the conclusions that warren is reaching, but I like that she actually appears to be thinking. More than any candidate I can recall. She's like a live reality show about perpetual beta wonky thinking, not a finished product.
-
-
I should try writing an endorsement post. I'm not shy about that sort of thing, and there's a chance it might help. The main thing is, I never know what to say about politicians. I don't grok the mechanics of elections well and don't want to. More broad arc of history stuff.
Show this thread -
Especially given a stacked supreme court, the next president needs to be primarily a thinker to outmaneuver the courts as needed.
Show this thread -
Also, last time, when she clearly stepped aside to let Hillary have her royal shot at it to preserve party unity, the contrast between them was striking. I found myself wishing Hillary would step aside for her. It was like the A-team ceding to the B-team.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When overwhelmed with complexity, my instinct is to revert to principles. In a PK Dick sense, "what matters is what remains when you stop caring about all the bluster." Is anyone sincerely focused on the ever-present backdrop behind the drama?
@BernieSanders passes this test -
I definitely don't do that. That's a recipe for puritan reaction. Principles are useless if you don't have a clue and have lost the plot. I think Bernie is a nice guy with good principles, but he lost the plot a long time ago.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.