This is like discovering Euclidean geometry, formalizing it axiomatically, discovering that you can't actually undermine non-parallel-line geometries, and then legislating that only the Euclidean parallel line postulate is legal.
Depends on the type of family and how far back, and what other notions of family (for example gay or with working wives) you want to either prevent or undo.
-
-
Its interesting that you have to qualify and so clearly limn the consequences of a vague pro family statement. I have nothing against gay families, or working wives, ... But such active policing of thoughts is.. not freedom. Is it reactionary to want such active policing to stop?
-
Who goes? Friend or Foe? :-D Thats what I heard.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.