No, not human. Just process. Kinda the same as wondering if the legal system is the public.
Okay I like that. It's basically the computational model of organization, with something like turing-completeness mapping to capability, and specific programs to functional aspect.
-
-
Yes – with emphasis on functional aspects (grounded in Pragmatism of Pierce and James). Doesn’t attempt to encompass other aspects of Institutions: identity, legitimacy, power, social cohesion, mythology/symbology,...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes the benefit of this approach is to make a formal relationship between organization capabilities and computational complexity plus automata theory.
-
One last point/rant I get irritated when I hear arguments against agency or cognition by collectives or organizations. (A collective is a temporary or empheral organization, however tight or loose) 1/2
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.