Ontology problem. Can "interinstitutionality" (by analogy to "intersubjectivity") be considered the same as "public"?
Conversation
Replying to
No, not human. Just process.
Kinda the same as wondering if the legal system is the public.
1
Replying to
I'm thinking one level above, the matrix of relationships among institutions, so the public would be (for eg) what occupies the space between legal system, market, firms etc.
2
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Which is the intent of my proposition. i think that significance has been overstated. Much of the explanatory power of a "public" seems reducible to the institutional web. There's not a whole lot for the public qua public to do besides believe in grand narratives.
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
That's my loose position as well, and the hypothesis I'm entertaining right now is that a sufficiently complete inventory of the explicitly defined bits would leave nothing meaningful to be caught in the catch-all.

