Taking things to pseudomath extreme and then actually mathematizing easy special cases within my skill level (mediocre) was my shtick in academia. I made up for being meh at math by using the math I *could* do as interestingly as I could
-
-
Show this thread
-
Math is a much more fun language to play with than English but radically unforgiving of thinking errors. It’s not that there’s only 1 right answer to questions, but that only precisely well posed questions have answers at all.
Show this thread -
Even when pseudomath is obviously overwrought magical thinking speculation, it’s a way to test an idea in extremis. If it holds up somewhat coherently under the absurd stresses of inappropriate pseudomath precision, there’s a there there you may be able to get at without math
Show this thread -
In some ways this is like poetry. If you can write out an idea as a poem, there’s a there there. Even if it’s a very tenuous one on the edge of nonsense like jabberwocky or hunting of the snark.
Show this thread -
The way I’m thinking about subjective time experience would take something like a protein folding algorithm to even simulate at toy level I think
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Simpler (if more approximate) theory: the whole of the remembered past counts as one unit. So 5 years when you are 5 counts as 1 unit, 5 years when you are 20 counts as 0.25 units.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
This is above my math paygrade to mess with even metaphorically. This shit defeated me in grad school topology class