-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
absence of evidence is evidence of absence, though https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mnS2WYLCGJP2kQkRn/absence-of-evidence-is-evidence-of-absence … http://oyhus.no/AbsenceOfEvidence.html …
-
Yeah, this is a narrow bayesian argument that simply does not apply outside conditions that are sort of ergodic in the behavior space. The general principle is more broadly applicable. You need to establish exhaustiveness of coverage to claim otherwise.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed, even as I find Cuddy herself kind of unbearable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Confident declarations and self-promotion in the absence of replicable evidence is discrediting. If there's a there there with power posing Cuddy can't be trusted to find it in a reliable sense. Just as not everything Wansink worked on is bogus but his work can never be trusted.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.