Conversation

If you classify western philosophers by what they led with, I think it is: Epistemology-first: Spinoza, Descartes, Hume, Kant Ontology-first: Hegel, Marx, Heidegger Phenomenology-first: Nietzche, Husserl, Arendt Treating these as stocks I think E is down, O is up, P is up a lot
7
66
Replying to and
Though I've also once been compared to Habermas/Frankfurt school, which is almost the opposite. I've also been simultaneously accused of being a capitalist shill and a communist apologist for the same essay, so go figure :D That's why I don't take comparisons seriously.
1
1
Replying to
All the best positions get that ;) Habermas & FS are v different (basically the latter is Marxist, with an emphasis on the sphere of cultural production as ideological apparatus), be suspicious of anyone bracketing them together.
1
2
Replying to
Yes, I know, that's why I pointed it out as a paradox. But no, it's not the same people making the comparisons. Conflating the two is a sort of sophomoric mistake that is usually a reason for me to tune out the person entirely.
Replying to
Yeah, I was making that mistake myself early on when I first ran into both worlds. Now I can tell them apart. It's an understandable mistake since both traditions came out of the same milieu, in response to similar zeitgeist developments, and do have a certain amount of resonance
1
2
Show replies