Agile
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Yikes" Is a shibboleth of my outgroup
-
Don't know if would be smart to taboo it though, Outgroup shibboleths are pretty useful.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"People." As in: "People think X... but really..." (with no actual survey evidence to describe whether that 'people' is 0.0001% or 90%)
-
It's even worse than that. Knowing that 90% of people think X <because of poll> does not tell us how strongly the belief is held. Some people get your point (how do you know?); few get the importance of the *strength* with which a belief is held.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
None. If someone is going on and on about something that I don't want to see, I mute them (or never follow them in the first place).
-
Yep. I'll avoid existing taboos for convenience's sake, but I've no interest in establishing them. And tiresome people are tiresome no matter how much you filter: far easier to avoid entirely. (I'd use a "you'll love/hate this feed" ML bot, though. Probably not that hard . . . )
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is clearly a wokeleban taboo list
I’d mute the clap emoji too though. That one is never good.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I'd rather tabooing a couple of specific words central to some debate topic / dialogue. The idea being that said words tend to fool you into thinking you understand something because you have a label and a couple of cognitive associations (ie. emotion & other labels) for it.
-
That being said, for a more generally scoped Twitter taboo game, I'd say any word that mostly conveys preference/affective valence but pretends to describe.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.