Postrat kids like to talk about “object level” but I don’t really grok that. But I like “log level” as preferred abstraction level. Very pararational. Zone of glitches, autocorrect, spooky entanglements, gremlins, alt temporalities, forensics, liminality, poop, entropic boundary
-
-
You want a narrative viewpoint that can zip through a world unnoticed. Something like a tracer but without a macro-imagining component. Just the tracer itself. In SF I’d make such characters sub-Planck scale
Show this thread -
-
Some good progress this week though on multitemporality, identifying log level as the right level of analysis, and red-flagging the time-perception accuracy as an unimportant cul de sac
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sometimes this works, sometimes you need to go all the way up and examine the very macro https://twitter.com/BuddyYakov/status/1172529458768515072?s=19 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
Not convinced non-macro-imagining is exclusively and always a featurehttps://twitter.com/vgr/status/1172766474651361281?s=19 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Hmm yeah, though lilliput and brobdignag being fantasy worlds and only approximate satires of England weakens the logging effect
End of conversation
-
-
-
Ant-man ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
see also John Crowley's "Little, Big"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
