My editor is suggesting I title the book BUILD a Second Brain instead of BuildING a Second Brain. I’ve noticed that people often remember it as the former. Which one do you like better and why?
-
-
Building
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Me, too, though I wonder if to some it sounds too passive/descriptive, vs prescriptive....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was my original thinking, except there's a key difference: "getting things done" is the continuous end state that you want to achieve, whereas "building a second brain" is just the setting up of the system that will THEN allow you to reach an end state
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Same. Continuous process seems more in line with how actual brains work e.g. memory *re*formation upon recall. Build is only better if you accept the 2nd brain in literal discrete sense, but the reality is that you are making a sort of extended hyperbrain out of the primary one.
-
Build a Hyperbrain could work, except guessing there's too much brand capital to change and it sounds cheesy. Goes in direction of exploding galaxy brain meme.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.