Ensemble consistency in hedgehog sense is dogmaticism. Grand unified theory preference. Coupling happens via fact that pragmatic world views are rarely purist dogmas. They are perpetual beta with some inconsistency at any time.
Is the situation more stable in time or case-space? It is not clear to me that different default assumptions for time/case-space are warranted. Your original heuristic amounts to "beliefs are more likely to be invalidated by new data over time than by new cases in scope"
-
-
Of course, invalidation via new cases also takes time, since case-space takes time to traverse, but you might never explore. So there is a time-scale separation. Backpacking to meet different types of people and broaden your mind is more traversing case space than time for eg.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, so it gets tricky, depending on how exploratory in case space the time behavior is, and what additional sources of invalidation there are besides case variety. So I do think time is probably a richer source of invalidations than case space, but it's not trivial to separate
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.