All the things I’ve done since then has been “jankiness worth fixing” things. Messiest was replacing a broken motor in our litter robot. Extremely yucky/smelly repair job
It’s all been basic repairs, jury-rigged workarounds etc. Stuff that’s 10% harder to do every year.
-
Show this thread
-
I feel kinda bad about drawing a very large circle around the media lab shitshow and tarring about a dozen other key institutions in the literary industrial complex with the same brush. They may not be infected, but they are vulnerable to the same kind of entryist exploitation.
1 reply 2 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
Glamorous institution syndrome: — Prioritize intellectual-glamor branding — Manufacture a vision surplus — Overpromise/underdeliver — Overvalue PR as a KPI — Big on manifestos — Charisma engineering as core competency — Fear “boring” perceptions — Spotlight-driven funding
4 replies 8 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
These are neither good, nor bad. They are just features that present a particular kind of attack surface to predators/parasites. Domestic cozy ethos is the opposite and has its own attack surface (often based on silent neglect and decay)
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
The media lab events should serve as a warning for institutions cut from the same cloth. - Pivot the brand now - Swap out impresario leaders for quiet bureaucratic-heroes - Reduce funding reliance on PR - work on problems that are unsexy and hard not stunts - refactor > vision
3 replies 1 retweet 29 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
This seems like a plan to kill the Media Lab. It's supposed to be visionary, so you need a visionary leader, or one that's good at picking visionaries to lead labs. They need to double down on vision, but likely a new vision.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickPinkston
Worth a long-bet. I think we're headed for a decade or two of "vision recession" where the initiative shifts to the opposite of "visionary" types.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
If you don't believe in vision's future, then you should probably just winddown the Media Lab and start a more serious research lab with a fresh culture.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickPinkston
Possibly. This is is in fact what I suspect a lot of funders will do. In fact, taking it one degree out, the funding culture will change, and a different kind of billionaire/millionaire will step in while the glamor-seeking/BIRGing kind will retreat.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
Even in a depression though, I think the culture wants hope/vision. If 2020 picks Trump again and the culture wars continue, we may have everyone asking for safety/normalcy more though and then you're right. Is that your bet?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Hmm I don't think Trump re-election is a good proxy. If he wins, his mandate for term 2 won't be the same as term 1. If someone else does, it will mean different things depending on who does. But note that there are no strong "vision/hope" candidates like Obama in 2008.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
A Trump re-election will be a referendum on the culture wars (and maybe whether change is possible at all).
@ewarren is clearly a vision candidate and on the rise. Same with@AndrewYang. People crave a new way forward right now past our apathy / inaction.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yang, yeah. Warren not sure. And I don't know what the election will be a referendum on. I'll wait for the post-mortem
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.