Conversation

Replying to
Even the maker movement which might seem like stealth/grassroots is actually kinda premium mediocre at present. Lots of 3D printing cuteness and crapjects and starter arduino “blinking LEDs” stuff on the margins while mainstream stuff gets more closed and less repairable.
2
29
The last “maker” thing I did was built a kit robot with a Stamp 2 microcontroller back in 2006, before the scene blew up. It was underwhelming and not as much fun as I’d hoped. I dumped the project after writing some hello worked programs like “go in circle, stop at obstacle”
1
10
All the things I’ve done since then has been “jankiness worth fixing” things. Messiest was replacing a broken motor in our litter robot. Extremely yucky/smelly repair job 😬 It’s all been basic repairs, jury-rigged workarounds etc. Stuff that’s 10% harder to do every year.
2
10
I feel kinda bad about drawing a very large circle around the media lab shitshow and tarring about a dozen other key institutions in the literary industrial complex with the same brush. They may not be infected, but they are vulnerable to the same kind of entryist exploitation.
1
11
Glamorous institution syndrome: — Prioritize intellectual-glamor branding — Manufacture a vision surplus — Overpromise/underdeliver — Overvalue PR as a KPI — Big on manifestos — Charisma engineering as core competency — Fear “boring” perceptions — Spotlight-driven funding
4
43
These are neither good, nor bad. They are just features that present a particular kind of attack surface to predators/parasites. Domestic cozy ethos is the opposite and has its own attack surface (often based on silent neglect and decay)
1
11
The media lab events should serve as a warning for institutions cut from the same cloth. - Pivot the brand now - Swap out impresario leaders for quiet bureaucratic-heroes - Reduce funding reliance on PR - work on problems that are unsexy and hard not stunts - refactor > vision
3
26
Replying to
This seems like a plan to kill the Media Lab. It's supposed to be visionary, so you need a visionary leader, or one that's good at picking visionaries to lead labs. They need to double down on vision, but likely a new vision.
1
Replying to
If you don't believe in vision's future, then you should probably just winddown the Media Lab and start a more serious research lab with a fresh culture.
1
Replying to
Possibly. This is is in fact what I suspect a lot of funders will do. In fact, taking it one degree out, the funding culture will change, and a different kind of billionaire/millionaire will step in while the glamor-seeking/BIRGing kind will retreat.
Replying to
Even in a depression though, I think the culture wants hope/vision. If 2020 picks Trump again and the culture wars continue, we may have everyone asking for safety/normalcy more though and then you're right. Is that your bet?
1
Replying to
Hmm I don't think Trump re-election is a good proxy. If he wins, his mandate for term 2 won't be the same as term 1. If someone else does, it will mean different things depending on who does. But note that there are no strong "vision/hope" candidates like Obama in 2008.
1
Show replies
Replying to
Immediately during a downturn I agree, but my question is how deep/long will it last? If it's 2009, then not that long. If Ray Dalio's right though, then we're in for a depression.