Just as there is "science envy" in parts of liberal arts/humanities leading to pseudo-scientific superstructures on their subjects, there is a sort of "engineering envy" that leads adjacent fields to create engineering-like agency fictions on their fields.
-
-
When I moved from engineering (a particularly applied-science/math kind) to these HSS type fields, while I greatly enjoyed the new intellectual challenges and curiosities to pursue, there was no denying the clear step-function decrease in actual agency
Show this thread -
And before you jump to the conclusion that I'm bad at this new domain, no, I'm actually unreasonably effective at traditionally "soft" things like management problem solving, *because* I have no illusions about the reality of seemingly "engineering" like processes.
Show this thread -
Invariably, when I've picked battles (either in my past career, or now as a consultant), the adversary is a pseudo-engineering management "process" or a pseudo-scientific marketing or strategy approach.
Show this thread -
By contrast, when I like something native to management, it's because it doesn't pretend to be engineering and owns the softer, subtler, poetic aspects which are hard to cast into an engineering. I'll take a poetry spouting marketer over a lean-six-sigma ideologue any day
Show this thread -
While I have sympathy for a lot of engineering-adjacent types who are often mistreated or undervalued in engineering culture, the fact that they have to resort to rights advocacy rather than just fait-accompli doing what they want tells you where the agency lies.
Show this thread -
By contrast, asshole linchpin engineers can be so irreplaceable that they can be effectively dictatorial in their decisions and others have to adapt to them (good managers know how to tame them). A sign of how critical you are is how much you can get away with being an asshole.
Show this thread -
Which is not to say you should... When you look at indispensable-assholery in the non-engineering professions, invariably you'll find that they're the ones who ignore the pseudo-engineering stuff, have no engineering envy, and just get things done their own inimitable way.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ugh you are touching on such a real trouble in the multi disciplinary meta studies communities where they want science and engineering lingo for their aspects and "theories" (read hypotheses, read thots) yet do not want to make anything explicitly falsifiable...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.