I suspect we’re about to see a zeitgeist-level design ethos swing from “ideas worth spreading” (TED, media lab etc) to “jankiness worth fixing” The specific sordid reasons the trend is reversing now are actually not that important. It would have happened even without scandals.
-
-
The last “maker” thing I did was built a kit robot with a Stamp 2 microcontroller back in 2006, before the scene blew up. It was underwhelming and not as much fun as I’d hoped. I dumped the project after writing some hello worked programs like “go in circle, stop at obstacle”
Show this thread -
All the things I’ve done since then has been “jankiness worth fixing” things. Messiest was replacing a broken motor in our litter robot. Extremely yucky/smelly repair job
It’s all been basic repairs, jury-rigged workarounds etc. Stuff that’s 10% harder to do every year.Show this thread -
I feel kinda bad about drawing a very large circle around the media lab shitshow and tarring about a dozen other key institutions in the literary industrial complex with the same brush. They may not be infected, but they are vulnerable to the same kind of entryist exploitation.
Show this thread -
Glamorous institution syndrome: — Prioritize intellectual-glamor branding — Manufacture a vision surplus — Overpromise/underdeliver — Overvalue PR as a KPI — Big on manifestos — Charisma engineering as core competency — Fear “boring” perceptions — Spotlight-driven funding
Show this thread -
These are neither good, nor bad. They are just features that present a particular kind of attack surface to predators/parasites. Domestic cozy ethos is the opposite and has its own attack surface (often based on silent neglect and decay)
Show this thread -
The media lab events should serve as a warning for institutions cut from the same cloth. - Pivot the brand now - Swap out impresario leaders for quiet bureaucratic-heroes - Reduce funding reliance on PR - work on problems that are unsexy and hard not stunts - refactor > vision
Show this thread -
It is possible to overcorrect and overcompensate and end up with the opposite pathologies but let’s start the swing back
Show this thread -
As a general principle, you “brand values are my adverse selection pressure”. Just like “your margin is my opportunity” Your brand values will likely hide a brand premium that is attractive to those who can pay the premium but don’t share the signal values.
Show this thread -
What is your weakness on flip side of strengths? Glamorous orgs = big marketing budgets = starved backoom ops. They are relatively inefficient fundraisers/spenders. Weakness: you need to raise $2 for every $1 a non-glamorous org does. Who do you think is willing to overpay 2x?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I actually think maker tools (RPi, Arduino, etc.) are so ubiquitous that people barely associate them with the Maker Movement, which is great. Peak Maker was about 2015, until megacorps pulled out. We're back to a more underground culture now + makerspaces for education.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.