Also UAVs, driverless cars... for lots of stuff, the foundation was laid in the 90s, much of it promptly forgotten, then jankily rediscovered/reinvented by tech sector in a software-eaten form. Sometimes better, sometimes worse.
-
Show this thread
-
2 reasons I think. First, 90s were a transition era between paper and digital, and a lot of stuff just fell through the cracks in janky early digital transition. It’s often not on google. Bad early webpages have vanished. Many journals and magazines kinda unraveled.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
Second, software and cheap computing/sensors was a genuine game changer. The 90s version of a lot of tech was just over-engineered and underpowered, and a half dozen Moore’s law doublings later, you could solve problems in simpler, cheaper ways. 90s solutions were obsolete.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
I kinda feel like the 90s were a secret little decade for those of us who weren’t part of dotcom boom (I caught a piece of the action at tail end, 2000-01, but it just wasn’t a big part of my life in the 90s... it was there and cool, but like most people I was doing other stuff)
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
The 80s though, that was a big-thinking decade. Great Events were afoot all over; no single thing could suck all attention. Basically, in the 90s we overindexed on charismatic internet and forgot other stuff. After 2000 it was big enough that the attention level was warranted.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Analogy: the 90s are a cache-invalidation decade. In many ways the achievements represented the peak capabilities of industrial era. But the invention of the internet kinda invalidated everything that didn’t have internet thinking wired in as a first principle.
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likesShow this thread -
Another analogy. What do you think was the best piston-powered fighter ever built? You might think Spitfire, Mustang, Zero, Me109,... famous WW2 planes. Correct answer is probably the Vought Corsair. Built tail-end of WW2... after jets had already changed the rules.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
The Corsair had the best stats of any WW2 plane iirc. 11:1 kill ratio. What eventually “retired” the Corsair in Korea was running up against MiG 15. Yes, there was a brief “hybrid war” period with both jet and piston fighters in the air (in WW2 they were too little, too late)
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
General principle of a technology being perfected just before it becomes categorically obsolete. Not just tech, everything is like that: culture, politics... The 90s were the decade industrial era was perfected...Just before it ceased to matter because ground rules changed.
3 replies 5 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
I’m sure there’s a name for this effect, how the last of a line of tech is seen as “perfect” IMHO it’s just “better”, and it’s nostalgia providing the “perfection”. Key examples: Concorde, space shuttle.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Diminishing returns S-curve. It’s real enough and “perfect” is approximately true for that local optimum. Concorde and space shuttle are bad examples since they were never mass produced enough to go on an S-curve.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
Good point. Do you have some key 90s examples to highlight what you mean? I did love my Discman and little boom box; the iPod that followed those really lost something with the pure digitalisation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ah, I did see a series of discussions of Microsoft Encarta the other day; that’s an example of the last excellent offline software.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.