The 10% that does not respond well even to large doses of money is mostly health and old age related.
So my rule is: try to stay in the top half by income, preferably much higher, and try to age healthy.
Conversation
Solving for life directly in the bottom half is far harder than solving for money, which is why most who are forced to do it fail to varying degrees and accept misery in proportion as their lot as a result. Kinda sucks, but hey, 100 years ago when that was true of bottom 90%
1
1
4
Tricky balancing act. You have to get enough $-flow, fast enough, young enough to escape misery orbits. But if you try too hard relative to talents, you’ll blow a fuse, burn out. Then, even if you overshoot $-flow hugely, no happiness will take root in space cleared of misery.
1
2
15
I sometimes wonder how anybody makes it past 40 with sanity intact
Then I remember, nobody does 🤪
We just get good at pretending to be sane enough to stabilize the $ flows needed to keep misery at bay and protect a small clear space for better things. Sanity is overrated.
1
26
“Happiness” in this thread is a loose proxy for any non-miserable state of being that can take root in space cleared of misery, usually with $. Think of it as a ladder of more interesting states, most without names, of which basic happiness is the lowest accessible rung.
1
6
I’m very skeptical of people who evangelize the character-building merits of responses to misery and pain besides trying to avoid them/buy your way out with $. If you look closely, they usually solve the hard problems with $ and save their stoic virtues for the easier stuff.
1
9
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I’ve yet to encounter a situation of misery so deep it can’t be made even worse by taking money out of it. Either first-hand or as a spectator.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
