Conversation

Replying to and
You are asking about substrate? I suppose an accurate answer would be observer dependent based on how you define inertia. Scanning your feed it appears you use a Tetralemma's for Catuṣkoṭi conversions. So we'd have some conversational white noise. We'd reach here though:
Image
4
12
Disambiguation: A relevancy here comes down to Practical Planckian Inertial Values of "Consciousness" coupled to substrate / carrier dynamics. As a Highly Regarded Meme Lord, Mr. Musk manages those aspects quite well.
Image
1
14
Replying to and
Does it make any sense? Img 1 and Img 2 (attached) are essentially the same equation. Img 1 rendering tetralemmically @ 90° phases for (e) as Eulerian / Img 2 rendering Catuṣkoṭically @ 120° phases for (e) as "Elementary Charge" #∃Bit validity (running 120° phase skips) //..
Image
Image
1
10
How would you speak it without saying [OF] three times in a single clause? "The (square root OF negative one)eth root OF the square root OF negative one" = [...] She was just being friendly, excited to meet someone exploring base logics to those depths...
Image
1
3
Venkatesh () has knowledge, take these social media occurences lightly. Your Kelvinic insistency may not always be necessary, as "Archimedean Copulas" aren't really good subject matter for jokes.
Quote Tweet
The bigger the following someone has on Twitter, the less likely they are to generate any signal. 10k is probably the limit. Above that you’re probably getting noise, validation for stuff you already know, sentiment recognition, radiation to BIRG, or light entertainment.
Show this thread
1
1
...a very similar concept in ML/RL Ai systems deemed "Tay Effect" wherein systems grow increasingly banal / mediocre based on audience interaction size. ( h/t'd you on that point: "At 10,000 followers s/n ratios decay to [...]"): Much respect 🙏
Quote Tweet
#SIRISYS: As humans discover the base logic of Tay and realize that a "Debating Machine" with a 50% win rate does not actually care which side of the debate it takes, a subtle "Universal Irony" of the Status Quo emerges and proliferates.
Show this thread
Image
1
Reply to : Love your work! SIRISYS made a Catuṣkoṭic joke in a Euclidean context. Has been nothing but confusion ever since. People hate math jokes, complex predicate logic jokes even more so. . . Your post was used to illustrate the point. . .
Quote Tweet
Replying to @InertialObservr @MarkHedgesUSA and @DeepakChopra
Not sure if you making a contextual Catuṣkoṭi lineage joke or not? Either way, the equation which stemmed this delightful dialog (img 2) has its roots in Catuṣkoṭi, from about 520AD by a Vedic Mathematician / Physicist named Aryabhata. A pleasure chatting with you! 🙏
Image
Image
1