When you look at international business history, it is clear that symmetric tit-for-tat is a dumb way to operate. Even if China is doing everything from currency manipulation to protecting its markets and stealing IP (not news) it is dumb for the *US* to retaliate in kind
-
Show this thread
-
The tools China is using are economic weapons of the weak. The US used those tools when it was weaker than Europe in the 19th century. The US stole textiles IP. It put up trade barriers. It protected fledgling industry and got European expertise to the US by any means necessary.
2 replies 9 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @johanatan
There was a broad, vast pattern of IP spillover from Europe over ~150 years that people like Trump would consider “moral theft” (as in not ethics, but react to with grievance as “unfair”). Specifics of prevailing IP regimes and legal notions of IP theft are not that interesting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @johanatan
I think it’s a perfectly valid. The self-serving IP regimes instituted by the west are not exactly noble gospel from heaven codifying an absolute morality for all humans. They’re expedient, advantageous artifacts created by powerful institutions at the height of their power.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
We have deep moral/ethical differences that cannot be sorted out on twitter clearly
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.