It takes them a while to realize but they always end up getting rid of the jerks. Naturally, a CEO would trust the person they hired directly more than others. But the goal should be to take action as quickly as they can when they realize that person is breaking the company.
-
-
I have never met an org of the first type where the rank-and-file actually buy the bills hit theater. I wrote this about the latter “asshole at the top” syndrome a few years after the fervais series.https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2013/09/12/the-exercise-of-authoritah/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Look into MIT MEDIA LAB.. giving prize to
@METOO for scientist.. this year. while patnering with EpsteinThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At scale, perhaps you are right and not being reductive. I think smaller (< 1 Dunbar) organizations call actually be mission aligned, but in a sense they are cults. I think it is possible to reframe the Gervais/Whyte paradigm in terms of "maintaining inter-subjective reality".
-
The reason we call the top of the pyramid "sociopaths" is because they are actively exporting & driving a different set of narrative realities than what the people within the org may perceive with their own senses *but refracted through the lens of prior experience*.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
