The near-universal popularity of tax-deferred retirement plans (free growth for retail investors, less churn for corporations, offloading of social safety net risks for governments) make me suspicious of them the same way I’m suspicious of mortgage interest deductions.
-
-
There is small and steeply discounted bias towards 100, 130 year horizons (children, grandchildren) but come on. Who actually has any good investment ideas that far out. So again bias ends up favoring stuff like residential real estate. Which adds inertia to housing stock churn.
Show this thread -
In general, horizon based planning is bad because it creates the illusion of long-term sustainability wisdom. You can’t invest wisely in the long term if you can’t think of anything to invest in that will a) last that long, b) actually be useful past that horizon.
Show this thread -
Even basic infrastructure is of dubious long-term value. The concrete paradise of 70 years ago is today’s emissions nightmare. Glorious highway systems and jazzy malls turn out to be overbuilding when economy dematerializes and localizes.
Show this thread -
Would low-cost index fund passive investing beat active investing so handily if it weren’t for central inertial mass of passivity created by retirement accounts? Are you actually investing in broad confidence in a nation, or in the time arbitrage of its tax laws?
Show this thread -
The leap from basic portfolio theory advantage of bundles of assets over individual assets isn’t sufficient justification for tax-deferred accounts I think. Maybe index funds don’t index to the economy at any given time, but its natural frequency in the frequency domain.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Beware the economic death throes of the boomers, then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dollars are a bad medium for 30 year horizons. The risk/discount rate makes it impossible. Once a slow-recovery asset is financialized (e.g. timber, fish, etc) the only sensible _financial_ move is liquidation then reinvestment.
-
Or it did, before rates when negative. But the risk-rate (unknown-unknowns) still makes anything more than a couple of decades a crapshoot.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or just make death tax 100% and cancel all other taxes
-
Just figure out a decentralized reallocation method tho
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.