When humans assert inconsistent views across time, 90% of the time they’re being dishonest, 10% of the time they’re sincerely updating their beliefs When nature gives you inconsistent results over time for an empirical probe, 100% of the time you are missing something
-
-
Dishonesty implies deliberateness. You are implying dishonesty is not as a choice here but as a state of being. Ontological as opposed to teleogical.
-
I was thinking that, but also 5 other things, so couldn't word it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.