Conversation

Then again, as suggests, instead of lamenting the #EpistemicCrisis and decrying #EpistemicVandalism, maybe we should try to appreciate the upside in the end of “epistemic monoculture”?
Quote Tweet
The only additional key point is that arguably the deepest epistemic damage which proliferating #deepfakes will produce is not that they will enable the propagation of falsehoods, but rather that they will enable the baldfaced denial of truths.
Show this thread
1
5
Replying to
I don’t think it will evolve this way. This is open-loop extrapolation and people are already starting to adjust responses (cf: Covington high case). Crywolf effects. When you’re conditioned to distrust a signal source you don’t just freeze in stasis. You adapt.
1
2
Replying to and
The thing is, FUD created by a bad actor goes away when the bad actor leaves the scene. But FUD created by technology agency expansion is a cry wolf story with no specific untrustworthy shepherd boy for the villagers to tag. So behaviors shift.
Replying to and
Older generations circle wagons around their ingroup epistemes. Younger ones adopt new mitigating behaviors that are a mix of more conservatism (default skeptics, checking up on snopes) and operating off a smaller knowledge base (Talebian strategies).
1
2
Replying to and
I don’t even think there is a real epistemic crisis yet. We’re learning that we need consensus reality only in a few critical cases like vaccination where there are material consequences (loss of herd immunity) to epistemic pluralism.
2
1
Show replies