Conversation

Replying to
And it is unclear that the 1:1 connection is the right abstraction for programming out social graph presence. It’s assembly language for sociability and I don’t want to be there anymore. I want C or Java level leveraged programmability.
2
8
Why can’t I declare some interests and filter criteria and then have an auto-generated script go wire up the follows for me and generate the stream? Why are we stuck with manual lists as state of art?
5
16
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Meh no. Just a problem to be solved. Not a show-stopping concern. Open API with red and blue algorithms for eg. People already do that with block lists.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Sure. That’s kinda what the [[jewish name]] plugin tried to do. Given a reasonably liberal API I can think of ways to Trojan horse any ideological filter in. Which I think is a) good for pluralism b) already happening c) inevitable one way or the other
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Look at how easily tech platform stocks recovered after the bad press/congressional scrutiny cycle. You seem to be assuming concerns and objections can shape tech evolution in proportion to the strength of the associated moral sentiment. Never been the case historically.
Replying to and
You want to mitigate the threat you have to invent mechanisms not moral arguments that you think might restrain invention and/or drive regulation. The latter 2 are pretty weak as evolutionary pressures.
Show replies