I never dug deep enough to form a solid view but I really liked what I understood of Brouwer’s intuitionism and rejection of the law of the excluded middle and nonconstructive proofs. Good vs. evil epistemology suffers from an equivalent ‘law of the excluded random’ problem.
-
Show this thread
That which is not good is bad vs. That which is not good fails to be good It need not be bad, it could be random. Hanlon’s razor ethics on a fuzzy good-to-evil spectrum [good — random —- bad]
0 replies
1 retweet
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.