Conversation

I never dug deep enough to form a solid view but I really liked what I understood of Brouwer’s intuitionism and rejection of the law of the excluded middle and nonconstructive proofs. Good vs. evil epistemology suffers from an equivalent ‘law of the excluded random’ problem.
Replying to
That which is not good is bad vs. That which is not good fails to be good It need not be bad, it could be random. Hanlon’s razor ethics on a fuzzy good-to-evil spectrum [good — random —- bad]
5
Replying to
I read somewhere that none of the hundreds of Indian languages have the equivalent of the word "evil" in its sense of pure bad/Satan
1