I never dug deep enough to form a solid view but I really liked what I understood of Brouwer’s intuitionism and rejection of the law of the excluded middle and nonconstructive proofs.
Good vs. evil epistemology suffers from an equivalent ‘law of the excluded random’ problem.
Conversation
Replying to
That which is not good is bad
vs.
That which is not good fails to be good
It need not be bad, it could be random.
Hanlon’s razor ethics on a fuzzy good-to-evil spectrum [good — random —- bad]
1
5

