We talk about post-capitalism like it’s a thing, but not post-democracy. All post-democracy paths seem like reactionary paths backwards. I suspect post-capitalism seems more real because it feels like we can improve on money as a technology but not on voting as a technology.
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ctbeiser
The former simply sounds like enterprise software and digital transition for government. The latter sounds like a fatalist acceptance of reactionary futures. By definition “liberal” has historically tracked the leading edge rather than pointing to a specific ideology.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @ctbeiser
You actually helped convince me it’s less substantive than I thought at least re: China basically larping 60s systems theory bs
11:41 AM - 3 Aug 2019
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.