We talk about post-capitalism like it’s a thing, but not post-democracy. All post-democracy paths seem like reactionary paths backwards. I suspect post-capitalism seems more real because it feels like we can improve on money as a technology but not on voting as a technology.
Conversation
This Tweet is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Replying to
The former simply sounds like enterprise software and digital transition for government. The latter sounds like a fatalist acceptance of reactionary futures.
By definition “liberal” has historically tracked the leading edge rather than pointing to a specific ideology.
2
1
(which us why “classical” liberals today seem to be both unconscious;y crypto-reactionary and fundamentally missing the point of liberalism in a very deep way, locking it onto a specific set of 18th century ideas rather than a leading edge of heterodox philosophical inquiry)
Replying to
"heterodox philosophical inquiry" lmao
It's just endless circlejerking wrt some new technology.

