Conversation

We talk about post-capitalism like it’s a thing, but not post-democracy. All post-democracy paths seem like reactionary paths backwards. I suspect post-capitalism seems more real because it feels like we can improve on money as a technology but not on voting as a technology.
8
63
This Tweet is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Replying to
The former simply sounds like enterprise software and digital transition for government. The latter sounds like a fatalist acceptance of reactionary futures. By definition “liberal” has historically tracked the leading edge rather than pointing to a specific ideology.
2
1
Replying to and
(which us why “classical” liberals today seem to be both unconscious;y crypto-reactionary and fundamentally missing the point of liberalism in a very deep way, locking it onto a specific set of 18th century ideas rather than a leading edge of heterodox philosophical inquiry)