We talk about post-capitalism like it’s a thing, but not post-democracy. All post-democracy paths seem like reactionary paths backwards. I suspect post-capitalism seems more real because it feels like we can improve on money as a technology but not on voting as a technology.
-
-
(which us why “classical” liberals today seem to be both unconscious;y crypto-reactionary and fundamentally missing the point of liberalism in a very deep way, locking it onto a specific set of 18th century ideas rather than a leading edge of heterodox philosophical inquiry)
-
"heterodox philosophical inquiry" lmao It's just endless circlejerking wrt some new technology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You actually helped convince me it’s less substantive than I thought at least re: China basically larping 60s systems theory bs
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.