It is strictly reductive. Modeling the dynamics of millions to billion scale population on those of a a 2-30 scale group is dumb. Like trying to port a car autopilot to an aircraft carrier.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the best synthesis of these contradictions I've found:https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/murray-bookchin-the-communalist-project …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Extrapolations of local-isms --> national-isms is symptomatic of trying to preserve legible cultural tropes by bulldozing through the nuances of its origins, warts and all rather than confronting them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They probably should be regarded as initial guiding principles (in lieu of superior candidates) but with *lots* of skepticism
End of conversation
-
-
-
Agreed, my dude. For other examples, see: Public defecation, domestic violence...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whenever people try to advocate some economic policy based on home finance, I ask "Does your family print its own currency?"
-
It is a helluva learning activity. My fam created one after a statement like yours. Top 3 learning event.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, even thinking of idealized families not everything scales up, but it's not utter nonsense, too. Many, not all, Americans seem to be triggered for socialism as soon as any community (one big family) aspect arises. But even Trump tried to get away with "we're one" lately...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fallacy of composition?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.