The domestic —> public analogy is one of the most perniciously wrong-headed ones around.
Walls are good for homes —> walls are good for cities/nations
Balanced budgets are good for families —> good for countries
Clear roles are good for families —> good for citizens
Conversation
Replying to
It is strictly reductive. Modeling the dynamics of millions to billion scale population on those of a a 2-30 scale group is dumb. Like trying to port a car autopilot to an aircraft carrier.
2
3
29
Replying to
We can’t help but think in local terms
The alternative is to simply admit we don’t understand complex systems but that won’t get you elected
1
4
Replying to
Extrapolations of local-isms --> national-isms is symptomatic of trying to preserve legible cultural tropes by bulldozing through the nuances of its origins, warts and all rather than confronting them
1
Replying to
Whenever people try to advocate some economic policy based on home finance, I ask "Does your family print its own currency?"
2
2
14
Replying to
Yes, even thinking of idealized families not everything scales up, but it's not utter nonsense, too.
Many, not all, Americans seem to be triggered for socialism as soon as any community (one big family) aspect arises. But even Trump tried to get away with "we're one" lately...
1
Replying to
The reverse is worse. For example, any and all public spending is "an investment in the future". You may not need to balance the budget, but borrowing should be for items with long term ROI rather than vote buying.
1
1








