Conversation

Replying to
I suppose at some point, as a kid before I learned the word nativist, I had respect for people who embody a deep sense and history of place. Even awe sometimes. But the older I got, the more I began to see that the majority who larp this are just incumbency bullies
1
42
When I find people who genuinely live the deep time of a place, I usually find that they are the opposite of nativists. They are broad minded, often know a shit ton about distant places as well, and exhibit a sense of having earned rather than inherited a connection to a place
4
69
Replying to
I think this is one of these things that one doesn't HAVE to politicize, regardless of the outside world -- there is room for reasonable individuals to disagree. Are you OK with outsiders moving into Brazilian rain forest? Han moving into Tibet? Americans buying Mexican land?
1
Replying to
As a military invasion (an adversarial social process) no. As a peaceful migration, yes. The specific point I’m firmly denying is claims of spiritual connection to place. “We know about this rainforest, learn from us” okay “This place is holy to us because blood in soil” no.
1
Replying to
Ha! I'm like you I have very little patience with the "sacred lands of our ancestors" argument. But I am a lot more conflicted about arguments along the lines of "preserve our culture/ way of life/lifestyle". 1/
1
Replying to and
And of course I then have very little patience with "we want to preserve our TRADITIONAL way of life, but we also DESERVE goodies from modernity"... There are many many aspects to this -- which is why I'm even more against politicizing it than most issues. 2/
1
Replying to and
The fact that A disagrees with B does NOT mean B immediately gets to scream "racist xenophobe"... In the absence of further info both A and B don't have a clue what the true motivations are for the other's stance. //
1
Replying to and
(a) If the social safety net is impossible to maintain it won't be maintained... (b) If all land, all property, ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD can be bought by anyone, who's the winner in that? The guys with the most money? And the loser? The citizens of uber poor countries. 2/
1
Replying to
You should post this as a separate thread calling out actual people you think are arguing this. As a reply to my thread it comes across as knee jerk whataboutism around a strawman version of open borders. I have tweeted about my views on open borders elsewhere.
Replying to
That’s the problem with Twitter, of course 😀. The environment I’m seeing (including the most recent Dem debate) is different from the context you’re seeing. ..
1
Show replies